Tuesday, March 07, 2006

 

I'll take "old news" for $600, Alex

So we all knew Barry was on the juice. Then the BALCO scandal broke so we really knew he was on the juice. Yet for some reason, these two dudes decided to write a book based largely on the testimony of a slighted ex-girlfriend and trainer to make lots of money. And sports illustrated dedicated basically the entire issue to it.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/magazine/03/06/growth0313/1.html
In case you live on a desert island, barry bonds is a jerk...and on the juice.

I think much more interesting than the details of nearly institutional juice-use, is the collective blind eye we as a sports-watching society turned to the whole thing despite its glaring obviousness. That is a book I would read.

Why did we give these people the benefit of the doubt when they were experiencing physical renaissances long after their physiological primes? Was it fuelled by a boomer establishment and fan base which was seeking a mythology to support for its own quest for continual youth? Is our understanding of biomedical engineering so fuzzy and our imagination so powerful that simply no one bothered to ask proper authorities if this was possible?

Did we just flat-out not care: the ends justified the means in the winner-take-all system that is American society. or the feat itself was worth the fact that it was meaningless--we gave a blowjob to see the panda (If you got that reference, you are a true 4-leafed clover).

Comments:
I think it has all to do with baseball being the all American pastime. If this happened in the NBA? I think everyone who even thought about the juice would have been thrown out. Usually I'd assume it was a racially biased decision to turn the blind eye, but Barry Bonds (an arrogant black athlete) complicates that argument. I guess people just love their baseball...
 
while I always welcome comments, I think dismissing this as racial issue for baseball is wrong. The balco scandal broke independantly. It actually centered on track and field. That trial is what forced baseball to acknowledge its steroid use. Before that, Baseball was turning a blind eye FOR barry. even a posteriori, baseball still nearly required congressional intervention to fully acknowledge the issue and begin testing. this isn't about barry and it isn't about race.
 
The problem is that we revere winning by any means through honest competition within the rules ... which means that the rules have to be precisely defined, since we advocate taking all measures short of the line of illegality. If that line is in any way fuzzy, then we can't complain as a society if our athletes venture into the gray. And the gray is far wider and murkier than you might think since common supplements often leave signatures of steroids or other banned substances; and thus our children of sports may be tempting fate by doing what we as good parents taught them -- do what it takes within the limits of the law to succeed and win. Drink Gator-Ade, take megadoses of vitamins, take that protein shake. Mikee tried something and he got better -- well, junior, you should try that too. And these are the kids of good parents. I have watched my child grow up on the competitive tennis scene in California, and I know that the parents of "successful" junior often condone mistaken calls if that allows junior to reach the next round. So the standard appears to be when in doubt, out -- especially if no one of authority is watching and that call will be a step toward success. Let's be clear, many parents live vicariously through their kids since, by having children, they give up their ability to personally achieve and so have little to brag about besides what their kids achieve. So some parents don't set fixed limits even when the morals are somewhat clear -- and when it comes to supplements, that line is not always so bright. The bottom line is that members of our society are reluctant to condemn practices that might ever ensnare junior, especially if arguably by some mistake. My guess is that if Barry were a Sumo wrestler, he'd be toast.
 
It's sort of analogous to Enron isn't it?

(btw, I know it's not about race!)
 
having reread your first comment, you are right. you did know it wasn't about race. I ran around bashing a straw man rather than your argument. sorry.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?